Posts Tagged: love


22
Apr 10

Love is to risk…

Saw a tweet from Exponential yesterday from my friend Jenni Clayville:

“LOVE is to risk. When we play it safe, we aren’t being like Jesus.” –Alan Hirsch

It caused me to reflect on how often we (his disciples) see Jesus in so many different ways. Some may say it’s a reflection of the various aspect of Jesus as he goes about meeting our needs or calling us closer to him, but I would disagree. I think regardless of how we feel Jesus is speaking to us, we always think of it from his perspective of loving kindness. However, in reality, Jesus was a risk taker and game changer! He challenged the authority and even the traditional rules of the holy sabbath day. Jesus was rarely in a place that would be considered safe. So, if we are truly following him, then if we find ourselves in safe and comfortable places, is Jesus really just one step ahead?

I’m reminded of the Nooma Video titled Dust. It’s titled Dust because back in Jesus’ day rabbis had followers that walked with them everywhere in the hopes that they would learn some great piece of wisdom. Rumor has it that they followed so closely that even while going to the bathroom a rabbi could expect a disciple to be at his side in fear of missing out on something if he weren’t there. They had a saying back then:

“May you be covered by the dust of your rabbi.”

Which in essence meant, may you so-closely follow in the footsteps of your rabbi that as he walks, the dust that gets kicked up from his sandals covers you. Pause for a moment and process that. Take any of the gospel accounts of Jesus that you can think of and imagine following him that closely. You’ll realize that Jesus was a very dangerous man in his day, and he has called us to follow him into those areas as he covers us in his holy, loving, empowering dust.

  • Share/Bookmark

2
Dec 09

Koo Koo Ka Choo Mrs Keaton

mbbSo, Meredith Baxter — known by many as Mrs. Elyse Keaton, mother to Alex P. Keaton on NBC’s Family Ties — has come out to declare to the world that she is a lesbian (news story here). Why? Why is it so relevant to us to know that Meredith Baxter considers herself to be a lesbian and has done so for the past 7 years? Do we really care so much about her business that we now feel compelled to judge her for her sexuality? Is it because she was Alex P. Keaton’s mother and now somehow her being a lesbian takes away from that memory?

One of the things about being involved in ministry is how people in the church will use this news as a reason for us Christians to rally together and pray for her to cleansed of her homosexual lifestyle. Unfortunately, this discounts some very important things:

  1. Only God can change someone, and it is his decision alone as to whether or not Ms. Baxter needs to be changed.
  2. If Ms. Baxter’s profession of homosexuality has doomed her to a life of eternal hell, then what about your viewing of internet porn, getting drunk on occasion, turning a blind eye to those in need or yelling at your husband/wife in anger?
  3. People are turned away from hypocritical Christians judging them, yet drawn to imperfect humans loving them through grace and kindness.

I guess Ms. Baxter felt compelled to share her lesbianism with the world, but in the end I doubt it will be what the world thinks in return that will matter to her. I sense this as a way to free herself from having to somehow hide her identity and pretend to be straight. Who is it that benefits from that perception of being straight? Obviously, those of us that choose to live in judgment and harbor prejudice. The problem here is, did we care about Ms. Baxter’s eternal salvation in Christ before she announced she was a lesbian?

Not to run away from my roots as an evangelical Christians, so for the record, I do believe that being a lesbian would prevent Ms. Baxter from knowing God–alongside him–in heaven one day. However, it is not my job to change her back to being heterosexual, if that were even possible. It’s not my job to view her as different or defective or eternally persecuted because of who she is attracted to or falls in love with. She is a person made in the image of God, just as you and I are. We all are. How he deals with each of us and our role in the eternal makeup of the universe is at his discretion. I can believe firmly in the truth as I see it, but must never move away from the truth behind the truth, which is:

Above all, love each other deeply, because love covers over a multitude of sins. –1 Peter 4:8

It is my sincere hope for Ms. Baxter that she one day comes to know God eternally in heaven, yet only on God’s terms and through his love for her as revealed by others. May her value and worth be in who she is–as made in the image of God–rather than who she dates or what we (personally) think of her.

  • Share/Bookmark

13
Jun 09

The Myth Of A Christian Religion, Part 2

myth-of-a-christian-religion-blogGregory Boyd makes the claim: “…religion doesn’t save people. Religion, in fact, may be one of the the greatest obstacles to being saved.” Heresy? I don’t think so.

Being a former atheist (as was Boyd) I can say to Christians that embrace religion, that it is your love of your religion that actually helped keep me away from Christ. Seriously, when it becomes more about words and judgment rather than love & grace, who in their right mind would be interested in joining that club? Once I did come to know God, religion did get the best of me–at first. However, as I’ve matured in my faith and grown in understanding who Christ Jesus is in me, I have been able to break free of religion and lend a voice to those that see it as idolatry and something that distracts one from knowing the true Jesus.

Don’t you know that when you take a stand and cast out someone that has committed adultery, or someone that struggles with alcoholism or a gay man or woman, then in essence you are trying to abandon them for the sake of religion. Jesus was known to be gossiped about by the Pharisees because he was seen dining with prostitutes and tax collectors (who were considered as enemies of Jerusalem at the time). Jesus shuns religion through every gospel account in the Bible. This put him at odds with those that felt the law was more important than the love of others.

Think about this. Is Christianity really meant to keep us in bondage to laws, or is it about sharing the love of Christ with others in selfless ways so that one day they may come to know our Jesus too? As Ghandi said in regards to Christianity:

    “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”

Look around you…look in the mirror…can you see the truth in the above-mentioned quote?

Boyd describes the struggle with religion as: “…religious idolatry is particularly resistant to the Kingdom of God. It’s no coincidence the main opposition Jesus faced in establishing the Kingdom came from the guardians of the religious status quo.” He goes on to say, “To establish and manifest the beautiful Kingdom in his day, Jesus had to revolt against religion. To advance and manifest the beautiful Kingdom today, we must do the same.”

Gregory Boyd contends throughout the chapter The REVOLT Against RELIGION that religious people get Life (yes, capital “L”) from their religion, and not from the one who is the actual giver of Life. For them, it has become more about religion than about Christ and his kingdom. Do you truly understand the message Jesus was telling those around him during his ministry here on earth?

  • From that time on Jesus began to preach, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near.” –Matthew 4:17
  • As you go, preach this message: ‘The kingdom of heaven is near.’ –Matthew 10:7
  • Heal the sick who are there and tell them, ‘The kingdom of God is near you.’ –Luke 10:9

It’s about the kingdom of God, not about how closely we can follow legalistic rules and judge others as they try to do the same. Don’t you know that Jesus was crucified because even though he followed the Jewish law to the letter, he was seen as a threat to the kingdom of God because of his love radical love for others and the authority in which he spoke? It was the religious people of his day that tried to squash a revolution of love for fear that they would lose power and become ineffectual. That even though it was the religious that brought charges against Jesus and eventually celebrated their hand in his crucifixion, we still cling to religion in idolatrous ways. When we do this, are we really Christians that are following Christ, or are we following the Pharisees. Is it time for some of us to repent, for no matter how we try to cling to religion to give us worth, the kingdom of God is near?

  • Share/Bookmark

8
Oct 08

Missional vs. Mega-church

Let me start with a question: Can the seeker-sensitive, mega-church model really be missional? I’m one of those that thinks it can. Missional really is a matter of the heart that is realized through application. Serving others becomes relevant because it is in the very nature of who we are as missionaries. Can such an environment exist in a mega-church? I think it can.

The biggest problem facing the missional mega-church is one of how it can be organic and easily mobilized when it operates with 2-5 services per day and affects 2,000-50,000+ in attendance on any given weekend. Menlo Park Presbyterian Church actually closed its door one Sunday in April last year to be the love of Christ to the surrounding community. With about 2,600 of its 5,000 members committing to serve others as reported in the Oakland Tribune:

For only the second time in its 134 years, a church in Menlo Park today canceled Sunday morning service and shut its doors.

It’s no crisis — it’s only because the majority of its 5,000 members instead spent the weekend renovating homes, refurbishing schools, assisting the homeless or building thousands of support kits for AIDS caregivers in Africa, among scores of charitable activities throughout the Peninsula.

As Pastor David Meysembourg stated in a comment to one of the previous posts here on the blog about the missional church, “So for those who are already doing church, the real work lies in becoming missional without losing the flock. The difficulty comes in transitioning from a more traditional church (which is many of the things missional is not) to a missional church. Education and training, modeling missional values, discussion, reading, all are an important part of this process. One of the first things we’ve done is to define ‘church’.”

Ask 100 pastors to define what the church is and you may find 100 different responses. Sure, the underlying theme and overall context may be similar, but just as God calls individuals to lead/preach/teach he also inspires them with visions that complement their giftedness and passions. Another point made by Pastor Meysembourg that we as pastors must be united on though: Church is “Not a building, not program, not an event, but people living God’s plan for their lives.”

What is God’s plan for our lives? Simply stated in the eloquent words of Christ himself in Matthew 22:37-39:

37″‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ 38This is the first and greatest commandment. 39And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’”

If we gather together as the body of Christ and love God completely and love others with the love of Jesus aren’t we being missional? Must there be a 100% buy-in from all that gather in a Sunday service in order for the church to be considered missional? If we look at missional as some formula of how we can “do” church, then the answer would be no. However, if we look at being missional as a matter of the heart and an application of our love for our fellow humans and realize that not everyone may be willing to walk in the same shoes at the same time, then any body of Christ that exemplifies the Greatest Commandment is in-fact going to be missional.

As Alan Hirsch states on page 182 of his book The Forgotten Ways,

“One of the reflections arising out of my fifteen years’ experience at SMRC is that as we grew and began to operate in the classic church growth mode it became increasingly harder to find God in the midst of the progressively more machinelike apparatus required to ‘run a church.’ With numerical growth, it seemed that we were increasingly being drawn away from the natural rhythms of life, from direct ministry, and that our roles seemed to become more managerial than ever before.”

With Mr. Hirsch’s statement being a generalization of what is thought to occur in the mega-church model of ministry, there are definitely large, looming issues inherent in this model that could or would prevent a missional dna from developing as the environment can lend itself to becoming consumeristic and inwardly focused. However, with a missional vision for a mega-church committed to the Greatest Commandment, all things are possible with God.

  • Share/Bookmark

20
Aug 08

Gregory Boyd has it right!

I follow a lot of what is going on in the church today, particularly here in America. One thing I am getting tired of is church leadership slandering other church leaders. At the center of a lot of this is political. Take a look at the forum Rick Warren hosted last weekend at Saddleback Church here. One of the things I admire about Pastor Gregory Boyd of Woodland Hills Church in Minnesota is that he gets it and isn’t afraid to talk about it.

As Christians we should be focused on the work of the kingdom of God and not about promoting political candidates or political agenda. Is it our job to polarize Christians through our political positions or are we to show the world that it is through love that others will know we are Christ followers as in John 13:34-35.

In his blog, Boyd comments:

In my view, followers of Jesus are to be concerned with everything Jesus was concerned with – and Jesus was obviously concerned with more than people having a relationship with himself.”

What are some of those things? Well, for one Pastor Boyd speaks about racism:

Jesus revolted against racism by the countercultural way he treated and spoke about non-Jews , so his followers are to revolt against all forms of racism.”

Boyd states that, “Jesus was a revolutionary on social issues, so his followers are to be revolutionaries on social issues.” However, he concludes with these profound remarks:

Jesus was a radical social activist, so his followers must be the same. It’s just that Jesus never once placed any trust in the government of his day to address social issues. He rather just addressed social issues by how he lived and taught. So too, we who are Jesus’ followers are to place no trust in government to address social issues. We’re simply called to address them by how we live.

Following Jesus’ example, we’re to place our trust in the power of the cross – the power of self-sacrificial love – not the power of the sword. We’re to trust the power of Calvary, not Caesar. And this is why I believe those who spend their time and energy trying to control the political arena “in Jesus’ name” are profoundly missing the point. Our job is to love, serve and sacrifice for sinners – not argue about passing laws against them. For we are to know that, whatever sin we see in others, our sin is much worse (Matthew 7:1-3)”

Obviously there are many that refute what Pastor Boyd speaks about. However, isn’t the scripture clear on this that Jesus called his followers to be examples of their faith? If we live by the sword we die by the sword. If we live by love, we are keeping with the Greatest Commandment and it is through our love that world will know we are Christians.

Here is some video of Greg Boyd speaking on this a bit for the CNN series God’s Warrior’s:
[youtube]e22TOmFVswI[/youtube]

  • Share/Bookmark