Posts Tagged: church relevance


5
Feb 10

3 Questions About The Church: David Park

David Park‘s twitter bio says it best: I dream about Asian-American culture and the church. David has a great insight into the next generation of church and how Asian-Americans can collectively influence the church culture in America. He hosts the Next Gener.Asian Church blog and is the most eloquent authority on Asian-American ministry. David has a love for–and is a student of–the greater church-at-large and lends a great perspective as he answers the three questions below:

    1) How would you define the (local) church?

    A disclaimer: I’m not particularly fond of my own definition of the local church, but I do think it is realistic and names how the church is viewed by non-Christians and is a good starting point for us to imagine change in the posture and future of the local church. I would define the local church is the organizational container or entity for Christian fellowship. I know we’re trying to stay away from defining the church as a building, but clearly, when we’re talking about a local church, we’re talking about an entity that (hopefully) exists with a particular objective of engaging people in the restorative, salvific, transformative, communal and missional aspects of the Christian faith. I say “hopefully” because not every local church fulfills all of these aspects well, and furthermore, they fail to take into account the strengths of other local churches. In other words, many local churches are limited in its true objective/mission because it is often preoccupied with its own perpetuation and survival.

    In an increasingly pluralistic and competitive landscape then, the local church often resorts to diverse expressions and tactics akin to the business world in terms of approaching market segments and developing various products and services. While this might make sense for the survival of organizational entities, it recapitulates the problems we witness in society with perpetuating systemic injustices, tribalism, and consumerism. It is a rare church that can display to the world what reconciliation looks like, or radical generosity, or transformation at the collective level. We take ‘ekkesia’ seriously when we call people out of darkness, but we have difficulty converting this into the ‘apostolic’ dimension of the church in sending people out.

    2) Is the church relevant? Why?

    Relevance is difficult to achieve at a macro-scale when we tend to create industries and silos to protect ourselves. The world simply is not impressed when we mimic their culture-transforming developments, whether in the arts or in business. The local church has the capacity and potential to be relevant, but many close themselves off from others citing differences in doctrine, in zip code, in politics, in worship style, and a variety of matters that implicitly tell the world that we are not as full of grace as the gospel we proclaim. Choosing our tribe was a luxury in Christendom, but in a web 2.0, globalized, shifting America, we no longer have the space of distancing ourselves from “others”. The Mormon, the Muslim, the Jew, the Hindu, the New Ager, the atheist, and the apathetic are all watching and we simply are playing a game (missiologically speaking) without any sense of gravity to our faith and our witness before the world at our doorstep.

    3) Do you see the church looking different in the future? Please explain.

    Old habits die hard, but the circumstances and the consequences are dire, so I do hope that churches look different in the future with a greater emphasis on collaboration and reconciliation. The church needs to not gloss over problems of individuals or of the collective, but to invest deeply an embodied doctrine of incarnation. We must recover what it means to be a spectacle, to live a critique against the idols of political power and economic forces, and display healing, hospitality, and care to a greater extent across a wider spectrum of people than before. If the church doesn’t look different in the future, we effectively forfeit our role in shaping and informing the development of Christian witness in the global south and east and their churches.

Learn more of David’s thoughts at his blog: Next Gener.Asian Church or follow him on twitter: @dpark75.

  • Share/Bookmark

4
Feb 10

3 Questions About The Church: Tyler Braun

Many of you may know Tyler Braun from his blog Man of Depravity. He’s the wild card in this blog series as he is not the lead pastor of a local church, but he brings the voice of a younger generation and is a seminary student and youth pastor in Portland, Oregon. Here is how this dynamic young man responded to the following three questions:

    1) How would you define the (local) church?
    A smaller and more specific expression of the church at large (church universal), designed to reach the world through discipleship and evangelism.
    2) Is the church relevant? Why?
    By “church” here I will move forward with the assumption that church means the combination of all local churches (though I do not think that is necessarily what the word church means, only that is helps frame the question in a way that I can answer). I say yes and no. I say yes because relevant is such an ambigous term that is often used when we think of “cutting edge,” even when cutting edge might not be what is truly relevant. Relevant means something different to each person in their own individuality. The many expressions of Christianity in churches around the world tell me that absolutely the church is relevant. I say no because my own experience says that culture is changing so fast that it is nearly impossible to stay relevant in the forefront of that change. And It isn’t only the church that struggles with this.
    3) Do you see the church looking different in the future? Please explain.
    Based on my definition of what the church is I would say emphatically no. Granted, I used a pretty broad and basic definition, but even if I was more specific I don’t know that much would change. Even within my lifetime there will be the changes of moving to a more internet-based approach or anything other specific change you see happening even now and churches will change as they deem change is necessary to reach the people around them. But the basic tenets of what a church is and does will stay the same. We will still gather consistently in large and small groups to pray, worship, and hear God’s Word brought in a way that makes sense to us. In that way, I think the church will stay the same.

Tyler Braun lends his insights regularly at his blog: manofdepravity.com and you can follow him on twitter as well at: @tylerbraun.

  • Share/Bookmark

3
Feb 10

3 Questions About The Church: Charles Lee

You may be familiar with Charles Lee as a public speaker and creator of The Idea Camp, but Charles’ home base is as the lead pastor of New Hope South Bay in Torrance, California. Here is how Pastor Lee responded to the following three questions about the church:

    1) How would you define the (local) church?
    The local church is a local expression of God’s people gathered for a common mission.

    2) Is the church relevant? Why?

    I think “relevant” describes a reactive culture. It lacks the proactive nature of culture-making that the church should be embodying. Is the church relevant? Sure. Many churches are reacting to the cultural changes and adapting their ministries accordingly. Nevertheless, I believe we need more churches that proactively create the kind of Kingdom culture that God desires.

    3) Do you see the church looking different in the future? Please explain.

    I think the church will most definitely look different in the future. I think more churches will choose multiple and viable networks over one central organization (e.g., traditional denominations). This is not to say that people will leave centralized organizations like denomination. Rather, churches will find themselves needing to connect with people outside of their tribe or family. I think more churches will start leveraging the strengths of the various streams within Christianity, especially with the growing access to networks online.

    Also, I think the future church will re-integrate compassion and justice into their Gospel storytelling. It will become more central of what it means to express God’s love for the world. As the result, more in the world will come to know a God who practical cares for their deepest needs.

Learn more of Pastor Lee’s perspectives on his blog: charlestlee.com or by following him on twitter: @charlestlee. Find out more about New Hope South Bay at: newhopesb.newsong.net.

  • Share/Bookmark

2
Feb 10

3 Questions About The Church: Joshua Roberts

Today’s perspective comes from Pastor Joshua Roberts of Encounter Assembly in Burbank, California:

    1) How would you define the (local) church
    I would define the local church as a geographic gathering of Christ followers/Christian/etc. that come together on a regular basis to worship God the Father together, encourage each other, pray for others, and partake in ordinances/sacraments of the Church (i.e. the Lord’s Supper and Baptism).

    2) Is the church relevant? Why?

    I guess that depends on which manifestation of the Church you’re speaking about. Some local congregations are, and others are not. I believe the more important question is “Is the message and mission of the Church relevant?” To that question I answer a resounding yes! It’s up to each local congregation to use its gifts and the empowerment of the Holy Spirit to relevantly live out and communicate the good news (gospel).

    3) Do you see the church looking different in the future? Please explain.

    Short answer: Yes.

    Long answer: Yes, the Church should constantly be examining itself (through the study of the scriptures and the guidance of the Holy Spirit). We should examine all areas of our theology and practice and leave room for the Spirit’s correction. If we do this, we should always be maturing, thus looking different.

    I also sense the Church is shifting away from the Western Culture focused ministry paradigm to a more Easter and Global focused model. We see evidence of this with some Roman Catholics and even Evangelicals migrating to the Eastern Orthodox church (article). I think we are many years away from the complete shift, but it is something we should continue to watch.

    ***Please note that I intentionally used both “church” and “Church” in my response. The use of “church” is to denote the local gathering of believers. The use of “Church” is for the church universal.***

Be sure to follow Pastor Robert’s blog at: joshinthe818.com or he can frequently be found on twitter at: @joshinthe818. Find more information on Encounter Assembly at: encounterassembly.com

  • Share/Bookmark

1
Feb 10

3 Questions About The Church: Jason Salamun

I asked several pastors to share their perspectives on three questions regarding the church. Each respondent is in a different geographical area and/or operating under different styles of ministry. Therefore, each perspective is unique and worth learning from. As you read their responses, try and imagine how you would reply to these same three questions. Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Today we kick off the series with Pastor Jason Salamun of Project Church in Rapid City, South Dakota:

    1) How would you define the (local) church?In a nutshell, the local church is a community of sinners saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ who join God in his mission in the world.

    Symbolically of course, the Church is referred to as the Body of Christ, Bride of Christ,and Family of God. Scripture gives us purposes, distinctions, and directions on how we are to function and organize but to answer your question, I’ll stick with my simple answer.

    2) Is the church relevant? Why?

    Five to ten years ago I would have said, “no.” The music is outdated, the dress code is too stuffy, the church buildings are on the cutting edge of 1890, etc. I’d refer to myself as a “Christ Follower” instead of a “Christian” because I didn’t want to be connected to THOSE people.

    I was immature.

    Many of us were.

    Many of us still are.

    A church is relevant because the gospel is (I’m assuming a genuine church is a gospel-centered church). The message is unchanging and relevant but communicating the message will depend on your culture. Speak the language but don’t change the message.

    I’m all for contextualizing the gospel to our culture but it’s so much more than cool lights, killer environments, and pop worship. Frankly, a traditional church service full of liturgy can be just as (or more) “relevant” as a rock show worship experience. As I look out at the church planting landscape, I’m seeing a bunch of cookie-cutter “relevant” churches who somehow believe their graphic t-shirts and a coffee bars are the good news. Sad, so sad.

    Throwing a pair of hipster jeans on the gospel doesn’t make it relevant.

    The gospel is about a King and a Kingdom.

    Every community is different but I do know this: love is relevant in any language. Jesus doesn’t need make-up to be attrative to our culture, he is to be lifted up and he said he would draw people to himself (John 12:32).

    I’m not against creating environments, talking plainly, having modern music etc., (our church does that), but I think “relevance” as we know it is superficial at best. It’s so much more than style and preferences. I think our generation needs to understand the gospel better and learn how to diagnose idolatry in their culture and people’s hearts and treat it with the gospel. Show people how they fit into God’s epic story. That’s relevant to any people in any time, and any place.

    P.S. Nothing is sadder than a middle-aged pastor wearing his teenage kids clothes and trying to talk Snoop in a sermon. That’s not relevant, that’s goofy.

    3) Do you see the church looking different in the future? Please explain.

    I believe in the church because I believe in Jesus.

    This defeatist attitude we have about the church in the west is pathetic. We already know how this will all end! We are the Body of Christ! He said, “I will build my church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” The question is, do we believe it?
    In the future, just as in the past, churches will gather in various expressions and models and forms, but we all have the same mission: Make disciples who love God and people. From house churches to mega-churches, from traditional churches to contemporary churches and everything in between, we need them all. The point isn’t to build the Church, the Lord will do that. The point is to point people to him.

    I don’t know about tomorrow but I know about today. The future is a product of the present. We were born for such a time as this and the need for the gospel has never been greater. The time is now!

    Imagine if churches followed Jesus and lived out passages like Luke 4:18-19,

    “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,
    because he has anointed me
    to proclaim good news to the poor.
    He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives
    and recovering of sight to the blind,
    to set at liberty those who are oppressed,
    to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”

    That’s a future I want to help create!!!

Follow more of Pastor Jason Salamun’s story at his blog: jasonsalamun.com or find out more about Project Church at their website: projectchurch.net. Jason is also on twitter as: @jasonsalamun.

  • Share/Bookmark