Missional vs. Mega-church 2 comments
Let me start with a question: Can the seeker-sensitive, mega-church model really be missional? I’m one of those that thinks it can. Missional really is a matter of the heart that is realized through application. Serving others becomes relevant because it is in the very nature of who we are as missionaries. Can such an environment exist in a mega-church? I think it can.
The biggest problem facing the missional mega-church is one of how it can be organic and easily mobilized when it operates with 2-5 services per day and affects 2,000-50,000+ in attendance on any given weekend. Menlo Park Presbyterian Church actually closed its door one Sunday in April last year to be the love of Christ to the surrounding community. With about 2,600 of its 5,000 members committing to serve others as reported in the Oakland Tribune:
For only the second time in its 134 years, a church in Menlo Park today canceled Sunday morning service and shut its doors.
It’s no crisis — it’s only because the majority of its 5,000 members instead spent the weekend renovating homes, refurbishing schools, assisting the homeless or building thousands of support kits for AIDS caregivers in Africa, among scores of charitable activities throughout the Peninsula.
As Pastor David Meysembourg stated in a comment to one of the previous posts here on the blog about the missional church, “So for those who are already doing church, the real work lies in becoming missional without losing the flock. The difficulty comes in transitioning from a more traditional church (which is many of the things missional is not) to a missional church. Education and training, modeling missional values, discussion, reading, all are an important part of this process. One of the first things we’ve done is to define ‘church’.”
Ask 100 pastors to define what the church is and you may find 100 different responses. Sure, the underlying theme and overall context may be similar, but just as God calls individuals to lead/preach/teach he also inspires them with visions that complement their giftedness and passions. Another point made by Pastor Meysembourg that we as pastors must be united on though: Church is “Not a building, not program, not an event, but people living God’s plan for their lives.”
What is God’s plan for our lives? Simply stated in the eloquent words of Christ himself in Matthew 22:37-39:
37″‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ 38This is the first and greatest commandment. 39And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’”
If we gather together as the body of Christ and love God completely and love others with the love of Jesus aren’t we being missional? Must there be a 100% buy-in from all that gather in a Sunday service in order for the church to be considered missional? If we look at missional as some formula of how we can “do” church, then the answer would be no. However, if we look at being missional as a matter of the heart and an application of our love for our fellow humans and realize that not everyone may be willing to walk in the same shoes at the same time, then any body of Christ that exemplifies the Greatest Commandment is in-fact going to be missional.
As Alan Hirsch states on page 182 of his book The Forgotten Ways,
“One of the reflections arising out of my fifteen years’ experience at SMRC is that as we grew and began to operate in the classic church growth mode it became increasingly harder to find God in the midst of the progressively more machinelike apparatus required to ‘run a church.’ With numerical growth, it seemed that we were increasingly being drawn away from the natural rhythms of life, from direct ministry, and that our roles seemed to become more managerial than ever before.”
With Mr. Hirsch’s statement being a generalization of what is thought to occur in the mega-church model of ministry, there are definitely large, looming issues inherent in this model that could or would prevent a missional dna from developing as the environment can lend itself to becoming consumeristic and inwardly focused. However, with a missional vision for a mega-church committed to the Greatest Commandment, all things are possible with God.
Sphere: Related Content2 Responses to 'Missional vs. Mega-church'
Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Missional vs. Mega-church'.
-
Great post Dave. I think I agree with you, I’m more of a ruminant than a speed reader. And there are many layers to this discussion. I’m part of a megamissional-church, we are doing our best to be Jesus to difficult times and hurting people.
Alan Hirsch has noted that as a church we have tended to look to our ecclesiology to develop our Christology. Our understanding of Jesus is the result of our understanding of church. (I need volunteers for our children’s ministry. Jesus lived a life of service, so if you want to be like Jesus serve in my children’s ministry.)
Our Ecclesiology should be the result of our understanding of Jesus. (Jesus loved children. If you want to be like Jesus love children.)
Our Christology should involve all of Jesus life, not just the birth, death and resurrection. When Jesus told his Apostles he was the only way to the Father in John 14, he said to them, “You know the way to where I am going”. He had shown them the way for the last three years. I think we lose that point sometimes.
One of the things that challenged us is our teaching times. Are we teaching topics, using scripture to make our point, or are we teaching Jesus? How much scripture used in our gatherings in the past year have been the words of Jesus? How well do our people know the life of Jesus?
We’ve dug deep, drawn a line in the sand and said we are going to preach Jesus. He is the hope of the world, and he expresses himself today through his church. (We used to say the church was the hope of the world, and Jesu was it’s head.)
God is doing a thing here, and there too, I bet. He wants us to join Him.
[Reply]
-
David, thanks for commenting! As you know, you and I are both on a similar journey to serve God’s people, yet me are being called down different paths in two different geographical/demographical communities. I am encouraged by all that is happening with you and RiverTree as God continues to mold and shape you guys to reach those He wants to connect you to.
I am definitely a proponent of preaching the gospel of Christ and Christ crucified. Under the new covenant of grace I think it is imperative that the world sees that our faith is not governed by legalism. As Jesus stated at the end of the Greatest Commandment in Matthew 22:40, “All the law and the prophets hang on these two commandments.” therefore if we love God and love others we will fulfill any and all commandments God gave to us. It’s not about the law, but it’s about love. The danger comes when the emphasis gets placed on love in such a manner that people stumble because they view things in the world such as pain and death and then define God’s love (or lack of love) by those experiences.
In the end, taking the focus of salvation off the church and putting it on the cross will honor God. I like when you said that Jesus is “the hope of the world and he expresses himself today through his church.” God will use his people to exemplify his grace and love and one day all the world will come to know and understand this as every knee bows and every tongue confesses that Jesus is the Savior of the world.
[Reply]

David Meysembourg
8 Oct 08 at 4:24 pm